Private preview

AI runtime governance

Set boundaries for models and agents—and retain context for what they do.

Poxek LLM Firewall is a model-agnostic policy and observability layer for prompts, responses, retrieved context, and agent tool calls. Teams can begin in observe mode, tune workload-specific thresholds, and move selected rules to redact, challenge, require approval, or block while retaining an explainable decision trail.

Private-preview benchmark

Targets for the private preview.

These figures are private-preview evaluation targets—not measured customer results, guarantees, or contractual SLAs.

<50 ms

P95 policy overhead

Private-preview target for lightweight rules; model-assisted detectors are measured and reported separately.

100%

Policy decision trail

Every allow, redact, challenge, approval, or block decision should retain a reason and policy version.

5 modes

Graduated enforcement

Observe, redact, challenge, require approval, and block let teams tune controls before hard enforcement.

Poxek LLM Firewall

Capabilities

Bidirectional inspection, sensitive-data controls, capability boundaries, and evidence for production LLM applications and agents.

Capabilities

Bidirectional AI inspection

Evaluate prompts, model outputs, retrieved documents, URLs, and tool arguments for injection, jailbreak, unsafe content, malicious links, and sensitive-data exposure.

Capabilities

Workload and tool policy

Define allowed models, destinations, data classes, tools, arguments, users, budgets, and approval gates per application instead of relying on one global threshold.

Capabilities

Explainable enforcement

Attach the policy version, matched signal, confidence, action, latency, and redaction record to every decision, with privacy-aware payload retention controls.

Operating flow

Evidence moves with the decision.

Describe workload boundaries
Observe model and agent traffic
Evaluate activity against policy
Escalate explainable events

Operational use cases

Where the workflow should earn its place.

Operational use cases

Govern agent tool use

Constrain which identities can call high-impact tools, validate arguments and destinations, and require human approval for destructive or externally visible actions.

Operational use cases

Protect sensitive context

Detect credentials, regulated data, and internal identifiers in prompts, retrieved content, and responses; redact or deny them according to workload policy.

Operational use cases

Investigate prompt injection

Link direct and indirect injection signals to retrieved documents, model responses, tool calls, and the final policy action without treating a detector score as proof by itself.

Outcome

A tunable runtime control plane that limits model and agent actions while giving application, platform, and security teams the evidence to investigate each decision.

Private preview

Bring the perimeter and the response into the same conversation.

Tell us which operating constraint you need to examine. Private Preview discussions begin with scope, governance, and evaluation context.